Yes, it seems that Java is actually a very good language. I would like to learn one a bit different, although. I think that Java is more complex than it would have to be, because of method inheritance to objects that the objects don't use.

Actually, I did a little research and found out that Java can use linked lists, all objects are references in Java, that is why some objects have clone() methods

Yes, it is the issues of running constructors over and over again. I can hardly imagine how many times this must happen, each time and item in an array is copied, etcetera.

Yes, I think that Java is starkly lacking in potential for aritificial intelligence programming. I imagine that linked collections are a part of metaphorical programming.

Yes, I wasn't offended. I spent a few days making an art program in Java. I wanted to make 2D game creation easier by making a plug in application for the language. I found that the methods to the 2D utilities didn't work properly. I could show you the code if you wanted.
it was like this:
draw(shape);
draw(shape's vertices);
if(button checked){
for(size of vector){
draw(vector.get(itemx);
}}
The thing only drew the first two. I realized that it wasn't worth spending hours and hours guessing why it didn't work.

I struggled with Java 2D quite a bit, it seemed that it didn't behave in the alleged ways.

Like with Java, imagine making a Vector class, when you want to access the stored variables you would have to use arrays, you would have to instantiate a larger array and transfer data between two each time you want to add something. Although, this creation and destruction of variables takes up time and space, the use of linked collection may be more efficient in many ways. However, when you want to access members of your linked list you can only get a copy with Java, not the address to the original.
This is all my hypothesis, not fact, but I believe that with Java you can only make individual links, in your list, the items that are made are made and made, then lost, so you are going through the process of creation with no benefits.

Hello Ehrlich,
I was a devoted Java student for some times. Although I'm a beginner, I don't doubt that C++ can exorbitantly out perform Java. Java's positive side is that it has some good IO, it can be used with great versatility.
There are some cusps although, Java, to my knowledge, has no such thing as a pointer or reference. With Java there is no way, that I know of, to get the address of variables, on hardware. What this means is that linked lists are impossible, in my understanding. What does it boil down to? Super losses in space efficiency, processing time and lacking in ability to run entire subjects of coding.

Java was made to be easy and simple to write, however C++ isn't so bad.

I like programming too, what language do you like? I like C++, but I am a early beginner with it. I believe C++ is the most dynamic language I have learnt about.

mysterious IQ84! I think you should try J. Christophe Grange! Crimson rivers for example :)

greetings from Lithuania!